No. 20-5099

Lantrel DeKeith Wilson v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment 6th-circuit consent-search consent-to-search criminal-procedure inevitable-discovery motion-to-suppress search-and-seizure sixth-circuit supreme-court-precedent terry-stop
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the decision of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals conflicts with Terry-v-Ohio

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED L Whether the decision of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in affirming the District Court’s denial of Lantrel Wilson’s Motion to Suppress conflicts with this Court’s long-standing precedent in Terry v. Ohio? IL. Whether the decision of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals misapplied this Court’s precedent on consent to search? I. Whether the decision of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals misapplied this Court’s precedent on Inevitable Discovery? i

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 17, 2020)

Attorneys

Lantrel Wilson
Mark Edwin BrownMenefee & Brown, P.C., Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent