No. 20-5101

Timothy Visage v. R. E. Woodall, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment arbitrary-action arbitrary-and-abusive-conduct civil-rights constitutional-protection due-process fourteenth-amendment government-liability government-policy state-created-danger state-custody
Key Terms:
DueProcess Patent
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment imposes upon the State an affirmative duty of care and protection to connected persons in State custody from the arbitrary and abusive conduct of government officials, where the State through its acquiescence to a course of conduct by its officials, that was not authorized by law, creates a custom or practice that is arbitrary and oppressive in a constitutional sense

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : A TH avesrien oa As, V&A, 1A (AWD of Soets\ Sev N84 | , White Hee Sake OA pave been AW Are Ok te daryts dpk Sogn Laced OO he . Lee worrd )ve proies no past CA Herr Otshian, Nas ava it do pr any do render Wien AKMere yal aera he lo urn Lan POSES UPS A govern cant S mgr ren aE ACH an Anos Eby cove MALAY, oleicva\s, passe S314 Cina andro] eudablishes a Custer OF practice, yaks Candace’ is Ar bhrar pnd oppressive in A crsdod ‘al Setar gy ron yh nok putas tad © taw, erat fs So well Settled) ask Vil kuary Canny ve [AW subjects or CAMge® bO be Subyectes 4 persar to . be tayuecd PA CAUSE ta eflect of tat _ prewar. Oe er pracke Suppers Q viable pace ae 1 Rar establish A) dan Sinton al clita under SO : a ati sen AH IY created State dary pursuant to 12 A.3.%FIAKSB 7" . WZ TEM PORTAR CE oF QUEstion | S. PRESENTED So The Instant Case Presents Anis Coust WIMA Unique ANA Lactun\ wack Qrund do SHE dis putes AR an 5 dhe Cienrrks, AND Aecisivrs TA Wer Similar Situated Appellate Couck deCrstans 1A A Cotten \ respect to state — created dangers Aad Its epbab\iso rey shecdacds rom An OEVANIRS PENTEL NS Lo eskblishk D Vinble mech aaven £30 estab \ish fay Q Cans hie? On| claam Pyisu ant to 44 A%-C. 3tAB3: AW Quesneon preseted DheWer Meo due process clause of © Me Lourleen Han Amerdmen ienposed Ypeon We Sivek an plore aue au, oL Care pnd protechion te Connected persons vee Sdale Custdy Lom ex cenhar of arbitrary and Abuse goverment | pole, 0 Custom Phrengh ACguvesence to a Course of Canduect by its pole, Mawel dh sug no + authored by law de State uc Ledero\ regulators ore so weil Settled AS fo irk ually consis | aw whith WAS COuse avn fact of . cConvieled persons Serous rm yuty. | Ly rettar ACHYAY Brod) ledge is cpeated danye b4 government Spote actor VO aco, uscienee +o pc bite?) / oppressive Cas lon OF er ache eek *S pind buted +o A ely mp VEE 5 dear CAU 2S fp Fagarohsc®) a) PUSH r ser igns | Fay Grants CAV ~. oblect & ; . ov putrorzed b 1S Une eo’) ™~ 4 \ gettled AS bs (aw Lux SO we . Cans kete LAM MW CYST OF PHRETLES | Twmomy C, Usage PID HEE | : Appellant VE, WOODALL , | CEiSHer, | CLOT, M. STONES | ; “ = crews , , C. , DHelerdantsd *% | ~“T | | — “

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-17
Waiver of right of respondents Emery Crews, Christopher Fischer, Melody Jones, and Ronnie Woodall to respond filed.
2020-06-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 17, 2020)

Attorneys

Emery Crews, Christopher Fischer, Melody Jones, and Ronnie Woodall
Marcus Owen GraperOffice of the Attorney General, Florida, Respondent
Timothy Visage
Timothy Visage — Petitioner