No. 20-5103

Makeda Haile v. Kaiser Permanente Tysons Corner

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-violation due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment judicial-misconduct title-vii
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment EmploymentDiscrimina JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Supreme Court will address violations of civil rights and due process

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether The Supreme Court Of The United States and Department Of Justice are going to discard the evidences, and ignore the violations, while corrupted and ill-intentioned court employees put our civil justice system on a slippery slope by violating the unalienable, constitutional and civil right of “the people”. Whether lower court judges can deny the Fourteenth Amendment right “.No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” of citizens. Whether the lower court judges can deny justice by being willfully blind to violation of Title VII, Civil Rights Act 1964, as amended. “Discrimination in employment based on certain characteristics (...religion, sex...)”. Whether the lower courts are “above” the Law, the Rules, the Constitution, and JUSTICE. ;

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent Kaiser Permanente Tysons Corner to respond filed.
2020-06-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 17, 2020)

Attorneys

Kaiser Permanente Tysons Corner
Rafael MorellLaw Offices of Rafael E. Morell, PLLC, Respondent
Rafael MorellLaw Offices of Rafael E. Morell, PLLC, Respondent
Makeda Haile
Makeda Haile — Petitioner
Makeda Haile — Petitioner