Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated based on the alleged denial of due process and free speech

No question identified. : IESE ES fp gep/ IED TR BEUS KE SEMEL AL) Nedber tite. teyel) toured. ever apiired Seated rnaffly Seteidiehen Gated on te2 hence (Yesested 17 Lita QD) Mehler pile bal) Louth, doo frterd robee, ob be. | ted on bh. free of Ha (tied Dik t a adele : x Daz i ike ~ é vd) aoe . ? . 7 bh ag, ‘ZB Pf? OS Lira He Fiza th Ve, € FAs VjpeeS 2ULpron Aer ee Mee es cf hy 7 Y 4) J, 3 Z Aete20, bo aasesthed La fsa. ff va hes Ales bps Addin tans Seg. Lek = of: ye" ay ® Sond Cathe Cra gt ol Tt te tah mae éy he? Ma fp KA Ken Laked on the Safe Sein D wtedle Kbbeins cb the Bush commathedl brad ‘ypon be Bech yy ep of -fopesr vb leeste. orbhe rés ef lichen, 7p : ones GFHE: 221 woe ay CAeAL on, Lhe regrs by of Ake 7 . ? ard bhaiegl 8 Conch Lange fetil fOCRES ball} ; ? V\VA poner, Due fioters ob ace) Go we Ard QD Ueble~ bf aunsle ryneserhtecg RL) bale) ta yechie i, Lyy/ eof Vadenableyneds Ake Ha frebetspop J Pot Ando Wie a, (Crkanade WebL hy Mok, Ef. Bb Lenp. aps Lye. 7 DV Nvéi be, Cl? ugh 1A lade no, AIP-33 6 Mi. fy V, Crh | C000 bed CtMGAEL erfaywk, rZ te keharf thie i OQ) iamch, Ltee_ Yyoteeg of hau) Cpt Le Beard end, Lise OS Bash Sikh saperdl cag ofeded ard Ayudice rediub beef whe, We Suen th Uh Lek cb barf farted dawn Me bod otlep off ay, fo. Making Cores Aedtein, 1 alehoay of S52, 4, Uo, | NYC)? Dil ckephondl Quetheo of Ope thence Qeceed spf