Whether the Court of Appeals erred in finding the July 2006 wiretap application met the necessity requirements and whether it erred in holding Mr. Ojeda waived his argument to subsequent wiretap applications?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in finding the July 2006 wiretap application met the necessity requirements and whether it erred in holding Mr. Ojeda waived his argument to subsequent wiretap applications? 2. Did the Court of Appeals err in affirming the application of a two-level firearms enhancement and a four-level, leadership-role enhancement? 3. Mr. Ojeda received a 20-year sentence after the district court gave excessive weight to one sentencing factor, while ignoring mitigating factors. Did the Court of Appeals err in affirming this effective life sentence? i