Whether the State of Michigan violated Petitioner's constitutional right to due process by presenting known false testimony and by using inconsistent theories to convict Petitioner at trial

estions Preseahed Por Revbew iene ene we ween fall Lt of Proceedings +0200 ne eee ee ee cacti ft Re Pe £ feniceS to Opinions .eece cee ee 0006s £8 £2. & 6 © © | oe ee eeen VO Soke unent of Tetiisdichlen <a 0 @ ooo ae ooo eo Vibh __ Cromgtitudbmoal Provisions . 20 oe. eee 22 ee IK : ALgu mets . . ae ke oe tw ee WIL. an eos ao Dl ENE Gi 3).8 1 lus/OA) 1 ae, |) _ Append xX ee — : a | a ae ae oe a 1) Expect APS dowd Pat hage . 2 2 ec eee ee ee eee 2) Polite Be poct of Proposed Veshin ony) ¢ oo oem o oe eee NY) Tursy Tsheuthion Presented soso eae 6 oe ome. 5) Ctrl Congdloiat & ARE Aa} 2 2 oe e608 ewe . Ss —_Referemee te Opiviows Below —__—__. The Onsoher 3/,2020, opluivn oF tho fb reieath Couct of ee OPfeals is Un Published al