No. 20-5121

Brayan Gutierrez-Diaz v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appointed-counsel criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment interrogation miranda-warning right-to-counsel self-incrimination
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether and to what extent a mistranslated Miranda warning, which does not reasonably convey the right to appointed counsel during interrogation, fails to protect a defendant's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when the resulting confession is later used to convict the defendant?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether and to what extent a mistranslated Miranda warning, which does not reasonably convey the right to appointed counsel during interrogation, fails to protect a defendant’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when the resulting confession is later used to convict the defendant? pretix

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-07-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 20, 2020)

Attorneys

Brayan Gutierrez-Diaz
Kristi A. HughesLaw Office of Kristi A. Hughes, Petitioner
Kristi A. HughesLaw Office of Kristi A. Hughes, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent