Thomas Eric Espinoza v. Colorado, et al.
Securities
Did the trial court deny Mr. Espinoza before trial his right to counsel, a fair process, confrontation, and the right to present a defense that would include the right to have his experts examine and test the lab evidence?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Fi undamente a /Miscarnige of dustice Exception . I. Petitionerwiff respect filly otempt fo €Spqblish 2 _ “Ftindamenty [Miscarriage of Justice" by demonstra lah ia __hel's ‘aetuall y innocent of fhe crime offemurderiag thi'swornay) —He will prove this /f the whole record 's revewed and Ae Jeter _ bf fhe law ss followed A cred ble showing of actual jaro _ CérICe Provides Qa gare way Fo cons/deratiorof an otherwise . _ untimely aim of Const tutional error QS GP Cpuitable . —CXCEp tion to the or7e-yeer M1714 Pafior Period. see Mc Quiggid V. Feria, 569 U.S. 383, 3 36(2%3)A considering a clam of actual nnecence //7 constextot phe ore Yeqr Simitation period ’r 2514..8.6 faayy(d).7ebe credible —__.q claim of. actug/ [TWIOCELICE LCRLITES @ petitioner Vo a _ Suppor t Ars ellega tors of Constifepionalerrer with _ mew reliable evidence -whe ther’? be excu/pa Poryor Scientific evidence, trustworthy tyewrtress accours, OF eritical ph sical evidence that was Not presented attra 1c _.. See schlup V. De/o, 513 W-S.298,324(/995), The Ge jwey Shor ld be operred/ only wherr q per fier preseaD _ evidence of IPWWCErICe $0 srrerg Pat 4. Court cap_ Not have conkdence Jy the Out Come of retrial _ Unless the Court 1's also Sa distied that the frial was free of nenharmless constthrtenal errer. “Per Kins, 56¢US.aFv0l QUEST LOM) PRESENTED. Fage 2. : __Gitetion Omitted) Did the trial court decry. Mh Lspinoza bebore trial his.cight Lo. cwsel, a. we file cess, ConfrenLa teraaal LO _. preseata.detense that .would iachide the tight te Lave his-experts exarmineand test dhe lal.h auidence please _ See fr Masters case ft GECRUHL Motion for ke fease.ot Lildee _Par_Forens ic esting (24) bi titB Sf the telal couct world lave —pecmitted. Hose 1 Gg hs. wold Mere have beast LE Lia be Cn _tdence.ot Actial tanecence! Did te pteial court Vie late Mr Espinza rights by not-pesting |2 teen Mot ba alyzed ‘tems! hlengwithall te jpems peshed tor DMA _by DA's office if Me. Espineza had his own defence experte would the test bavebeen difteraatin pesuler ! ! phase see Trial teaaseripes Exbiib (LL. Dpages. Did: Phe trie Court violate Me. Espinoza; ghts ; by Perciag. Pron —ttlal court-appointed defense Counse/ Theat Satled . —ta_tnvestigale 'his.aetuel phocence, creating a titra Vires Ach in every thins hey did foe. pe titiener pease. i see Lophs CARAL Ehib:tH nd nohng take ncorple. context andthaldbe argued by a real det lupedta __ Me. Masters Case arly ether bis DNA Euidence vas tasted by fercing the.state of Colerade 7a doSo.wes re prover __jnnecent Lt fhis Lotovable Court would grat the pia ete Bpthpnec believes phe pesil! of. _ fod cates wold be fhe Simm... Wank you oo QuesTtoms) PRESENTED fage 3, —.. Ze Did the Stave District Cour f Vio late (e771 f _yorners lue. process an o/ speedy trial righ é Yy tailing _7e bring bitr 7e frid | on fhe SPaked Aare in thf peoples CARA” Dred the Trial Co turp tease _ Jorisdic. Hort whe St set the rather For frist be yore January fe, 2007 : lease JSée /etitvor For hes e7o Soy _ Cause. /ersuant xo CAR WM Exh b: AM Did the Bis _ trict Court viola we Speedy pria/ rightend be TOCESS — of fe Espinoza_orn he /5s-ies Concerning CTT. Ke 4596 / _ fidvoca y Vv. Bicha, Chit Aetiors No [PLEV -PAE5-4NE an fe ote Ls. Gort of Cohrado | ROW. The same __kssues described in his Ge, hetor Auypened So (tir bpm, yp Bid al fs ? defense cournse/ ariel! Aree tAp_ els counse/ Violate fir. Epincza rights fo effechve _ assistance of Counse/. Prease see Striekland V. Wash_1ng ton, 466. G68 (1984) — Cronic PEELS. Gf b6SY LEA __ptener Vr espect fs My reguests this Ponore ble Court look _ of the complese record regarding the Ip hhectivé @s5dstance. Counse/ "Direct Appeals Counsell. J) berto To _ Carcia CARF3Y6 [8 and his pas tnetbective assistance of Counsel! orr other Peep te, Hé failed yg argue ET r. for L Lega/ Ad\veca cy V Licha CVV Actrer and tay Hisues Conter{i _ this achiere bit ont briehy ner Konred, V7 please See 4 _. Alrtian Kor fialargbex