Whether this Court should issue a writ of certiorari

ISSUE PRESENTED i. ‘ WHETHER THIS COURT SHOULD ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN ORDER TO CORRECT THE SIXTH CIRCUITS DECISION IN DENYING PETITIONER A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AS ITS DECISION CONFLICTS WITH DECISION OF THIS COURT ON IMPORTANT MATTER OF FEDERAL LAW AS MR. SHEER HAS MADE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT? II. WHETHER DAVID SHEER WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO CONFRONTATION UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL WHERE THE TRIAL COURT FAILED TO ADMINISTERED THE OATH TO MISTY JUSTICE PRIOR TO TESTIFYING UNDER MICH. COMP. LAW §600.14327 III. WHETHER DAVID SHEER WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHERE HIS TRIAL COUNSEL FAILED TO ASSERT A TIMELY OBJECTION CHALLENGING THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE VIOLATION OF MISTY JUSTICE NOT ADMINISTERED A OATH PRIOR TO TESTIFYING? Iv. WHETHER DAVID SHEER WAS DENIED HIS FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL BY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY PROVIDING os FALSE TESTIMONY THAT MISTY JUSTICE AND DAVID SHEER RESIDED , TOGETHER AT THE TIME OF THE ROBBERY OF INTIMATE IDEA STORE? : Vv. WHETHER DAVID SHEER WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHERE HIS APPELLATE COUNSEL FAILED TO INVESTIGATE AND RAISE THE PROSECUTION DENIED HIM HIS FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO FAIR TRIAL BY PRESENTING FALSE TESTIMONY TO THE JURY?