No. 20-5130

Antonio Lozano Solis v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-court access-to-courts appeal-review civil-rights constitutional-right criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was petitioner denied meaningful access to the court?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS Presented to the CouRT 4. Was petitioner denied meaning full actesste the court? 7 Legos ofquments : & 2. Does Petitioners ENAFFECTIVE AssiSTANCE OF CouNCEL clam to Reauite o. CostlFiGnte oF Appeal? _Juflst_0F Reason Wold Find the disttict Coutts Pulling debatabe, 5 Tutist of Yeasen Would Find 14+ depetable Wheatner the Petition = ___ Stokes Volid loin Of ame denial OF & Cons: tituHonal Pight, A . Jurist oF Yenson Would Find i+ devotable Whether the Petition _ Stokes volid claim of the deniol of a Constitutional right, 24 0 Reosonoiie Iufist Would Find tne disttict Coutts fuling debotnbles 23 _ A Conch Sto | iV oe

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-06
Waiver of right of respondent David Shinn to respond filed.
2020-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 20, 2020)
2020-03-06
Application (19A986) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until June 11, 2020.
2020-02-23
Application (19A986) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 12, 2020 to June 11, 2020, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Antonio Lozano Solis
Antonio Lozano Solis — Petitioner
David Shinn
Myles Austin BraccioOffice of the Arizona Attorney General, Respondent