Whether the Petitioner's application for a certificate of appealability was improperly denied

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 2, 3. | Woether the Petttidren oktar sattirg fart, 9 documentary Case + (opatid withia Diath ciecett cit Case US. 19-fEsc a in Corganctivy | = ff WRG Sth Cireulth Cort Ose WIT ISISA denunrstratd tot &. || Arcade ME toe appacect makes aod appssite <sreeties beftibinn 7. | these Od Sees phot seiairsted sat OF the same Noyada gg |] Stote District Cuuet Mee Ne 2012640 12, Keyada. Sepeemd g |p codet Cose JS. qeet7 shpuld HVE bem reyisubed on bore 96 (s, || Tequesta cL Tho astra ef (“pettad Hebi lity, tr. Rircsusat 46 United Steotes Sup Codet: Rufo4 b(-* le, “ag state Coctswe > Untted statin Codet a& ws, appeals hac decided 94 impartart question © Gacloral las that i has net bean, Sut Should de Settled Ay this Cet ow 45s ts. |] Cosided 96 joa pects rt faders quisty om ta 3 nay 4h at ConCli ets le. Wh roleva4gt decisians © thie Chirk" (0. Taerskers, Whether the Petitisrcs applicnttdfoc > 1W. | aetificste of Appar bilitg (Gest sidjor his Secard repect’ gy wise dscsated whan the Fetitts ver dorgenstrated os. || consti atacas! Vieldi07 een ohio El sewing the the ol, |] ectoblished pathe © Uskase Crops aod thinethe oo, |] #2 dss. 3 O85. | 3. a . oy, BS 2, 27. Ye, at