No. 20-5139

Algere Jones v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment criminal-procedure due-process exclusionary-rule federal-district-court fourth-amendment search-and-seizure standing supervised-release
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can a federal district court bar the use of the Exclusionary Rule during the petitioner's violation of supervised release hearing?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, the petitioner’s underlying state court case was dismissed by the trial court applying the Exclusionary Rule, can a federal district court bar the use of the Exclusionary Rule during the petitioner’s violation of supervised release hearing? i

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-07-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 21, 2020)

Attorneys

Algere Jones
Marlon Geoffrey KirtonKirton Law Firm, Petitioner
Marlon Geoffrey KirtonKirton Law Firm, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent