Whether the refusal to provide an accommodative diet or authorize food issues that address Ward's documented food allergies/intolerances violates his constitutional and statutory rights, including the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, and 14th Amendments

ESTIONS) PRESENTED EM _ : . + ¢ ve ah 7hihoas Chostter"WaRDt Ra CREFUSAL TO PROVIDE ACCOMMODATIVE DIETOR EVEN NOTHORIZE FOOD TSSDES|RARE AUERY /THTOLERANEES 10% PoTyTOS; BEANS; SAGE{DISCOVERED IN: OGTALNBRENT] «R ADISHES) CHOCOLATE; NONOSODIOM CAUTIMATE ARTIFICIAL, SWEETHOBR} (HERRIES; BLUE PARRIES, SWEETEN ERSEARTICLALYSANP EVEN REROSAL(Q TO EXCLUDE SUCH FOODS: . HAVE ALSO RAD SWORN WITNESSES <11/4/an172 4/4 /taz) AND STAFECCONSENTING) OBSERVE REACTION ; TO AWENETED TREATMENTS ; SUBSTITUTIONS (BX: MIGHTY SHAKES)TAND COMPUANCES Wek: ALL. VLOLAIISIG RIGHTS? ek @, COORTS HAVE PRONIBITED PUBLICATION OF NEMORANDDM (CONDIRAINING: FREEDOM OF PRESS AND FREE SPEECH; PROTEST; ALONG WITH PETITIONING FoR RELIEF) e" NOT FOR PUBUCATION) 22 ‘waRD's* LEGAL 3.COURTES) ;AND OPPOSING PARDIES HAVE, AS A RESULT, HAVE VIOLATED WARD'S LEGAL, * CONSTITUTIONAL, AND STATUTORY RIGHTS AS A CONSBQUBNCE OF SUCH, HAVE THEY NOT? Ast AMEADMB AT RIGHTS (FREEDOM OF:SPBECH OF: PRESS; OF: PETITION; OF: PROTEST; AND: GRIBVANCE(S) 7 ~ 4TH AmpND MENT Ri6HTS (SECORE (SHFETV] AGAINST: PROPERTY; AND SAFETY [FROM: FOOD jAMD _ THREAT(S., PROM: OPFICER & OFFENDER } AND AGAINST PROBLEM F00p])? TELE AMENDMENT RIGHTS EDU PROCESS OF LAW; AND TOST COMPENSATION [HEANING: DISCHARGE r; FROM PRISON; AND MONETARY (oR EQUIVALENT) DAKAGE(S) [FoR TRAY We {COONSBLIR ETC] OR! $2,000,000 ANd MN AccoMmOD ATI VE DIEt J; $2,090,000 DAMAGE(S) AWARDED REGARDLESS (e0R RESULTART: HARDSHIP. THREAT) HARM: ABUSE;TRAOUAY AND PUNITIVE7 NOMINAL Discei Muy atlow(s),2 ~ UK AMENDMENT (TRIAL BY JURY IN WWI CASES [EXAMPLE:CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT pos.ceeea, WHICH bs ve BVBD AFFORDED BVEN BY: tpAHO cope (LC SE48 F901 ot. seq.) 2? ~STH AMEND MENT (Goo CRUEL AND vNUSDAL PUNISHHEAT [WEIGHT LOSS CevEN REACHED UNDERWEGHTD® _ pS THREAT ; PBL INDIFFERENCE (3.0.0. /0.0.0.C. STARE: MENTAL HBALTH BAL ooe PERSON BUTS ANY RMPRASSHEAT FROM: OFFICER AND Orton hee 7 ANB HEALTH (HE <coRtezan’ “ATM AMEND MENT(RioHTS RETAINED oy PEOPLE «SHAUL WOT €B CONSTRUED to DENV of DI T NOLATIO NG) AGAINST 0. WARDS? NSTRUED TO DENY Of DISPARAGE) “10TH AMENDHERT (RiGtits RESERVED To oc PEOPLE [:-WARD')) ; (ONGRU BIT (FoR) wt: AATH AMENDMBEIT (000 EQUAL PROTECTION [SOVEREIGN(s}]); HOLATION SA, IS NOT THE toAHO STATE CONSTITOTION: AND: BROUGHT AS AIWSTS «WARDS (ine UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION , AGAINST suck VioLAtiONS; CONDITIONS OFCOM NEB SRasut oF we peeet uate ZAND HARMEUL CIRCUMSTANCES CAN F Sales ie We Sune bee ee eee Ms ea 00N 20.02 fu) BedtonGah DOT RESOLT oF DBTANMBAT/cA PH YITY ( Wes Tore rf ce 4098 ee fe i Qc i et. *48-2991. z O) “TRAUMA RCE: 4004 94805 (6 spp eae UACTRESERVE DeTActieuT| fois gue? #5: Is IT NOT ABISE OF DISCRETION, 10 DENY REQUEST OF LEGAL COUNSEL. ONLY To THEN EXPECT ONE “.--WARD' T) RISE UP 1 STANDARD OF LAWYER (KNOWING ALL COURT:QULES; THe eee COMORES) AWD THE LIKE); Without ERRORS, ONLV TO THEN DISMISS SOCKS FOR : ¥ SAM Kad ; ; > E REASONS?? VIOLATING GTH AMENDMENTS IN Pagr?>? & SBE AMSos