Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the prison authorities' failure to protect the petitioner's safety and security

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : fok AS ONTRAINED INLAW CNOT LAWYER? Set _ . LS NOT FALURE TO KEEP SECURITY (SAFETY -IN ONE'S PERSON [AND OR EFFECTS (BX: T-SHIRT (RIPPED): 1 REUSING -REPORTEP—> VIGLATEDIIN ONE'S OWN CELL Senne nn TE epts Beis s2:sp0h-NOX]>] BY AUGTHERINTRODING {AND THREATENING)~INMATE (ROB N5-#88352? > BECIDE OTHERS CNESHIKOPHT >7 AND beatin poLaTONS ai STAFF (0. Roserts[ J, AND PRoctoR; AS WELL AS NUMEROUS OIHBRS);AND FLAGRANT RD BY: PRISON ADMINISTRATION BA: Ns . AND PRIOR WARNING C2.C.IE.O,fOROFING) SCARIER Mtoe oF Wea esr mnailfee%e eanon tr THEGOVERNMEWT,FOR A REDRESS OF GREVANCES [SAFETY ALERT AGKIMST BEING HOUSED Ate ET (FREE OF AND SOPRIENT To AsseRT DISCHARGE < FROM: PRISON-)/DAMAGES (FIR TRAUMA)-? RDO EEC CTT an ne ae wish IN THEIR PERSONS ; + EFFECTS +) VIOLATIONS -AGAINS ‘WARD, ? Pains ENT (-.BE TWICE] TUDGHENT AND CONVICTION -& PRISON «J ;THEN, THREAT AND RE ” ROME THEN, PEATED ASSAUL ES” NESHI KOE ROBBINS ; ANO [COLLUD ING? PRISON 3 n vt ay neat Jrouc unto? Pes Ric ON ISTRA TION "PUT (8 JEOPARDY OF LIFE AND LIMB) ViGLATION C, FEL AMBUD MENT ( AtRI . tasapa oh panes MIRIAL BY TORY AS REQUESTED) VIOLATION; AGAINST “WARD: ? (IN: CIVIL-Cases) pe WwiEp 0, OT! AMENDMENT (CRUEL AND UNOSUAL PUNISH HENT[CAEETY /SBCURITY YIOLATIONS (C.0.BAKER’CHARGE CHECK ON CELL 102+" > AND (0, ROBERTS [PROPPING OFFICE HOCK OPEN: --JoAND SUBSEQUENT INCE DENCES {ALL PRESENTBO {\ EXH(BITSJOURNAL ENTRIES “CHECK CAMERASS--J) AND SUBSEQUENT THREATS AND Ss AucTs N ow CELL ReteaTeDL]... SUCH NOT A REPEAT VIOLATION OF 's’ ( an PUNISHMENT “22 NARD'S' RIGHTS AGAINST CRUEL AND UNUSOAL B. TTH AMEND HEWT (RIGHTS RETAINED BY PEOPLE «e«SHALL Wat BE TH vee CONSTRUE? TO DENY VIOLATION (3) AGAINST “WARD'? oR DISPARAGE ) Fi au AMEND NENT (eIcHTs REssRVED TO ---PEOPLE[:“WARD'T) ,CONGRUBAT[FORTHER) WIth: F/G. 4474 AuewoMeNt (~ FQuqL PROTECTION [sovererssics]) viot ations(SLAsAinst: wap’? #k 2. TS WOT ANSWERWITH CAPTION “NOT FOR PUBLICATIONS A VIOLATION OF WARD's RIGETS 10: A. FREEDOM to PROTEST Petition: (oort(s); Hedia/oin(syand other Aodiencetsy-for a redress oF 8 Grievances {ST AMEN DNENT-U.S. CONSTITUTION ) 7 < FREEDOM To PROTECT SELECFURIHER[BY ~‘ > . . c Peete knowledged rrancerelied re ee tie BELLE ‘SAF Ey cet ABS CoS, CONSTTTOT nt ‘ riot oR AN ST Rey erg SAPARD Ys THREATS: ASSAULTS; AND CONTINUED CAND REPEATED) SAFETY ; UFE ORUMGEORIHER NE HEUTowsr nes tons < causing deptévation of liberty AND RISK OF D.FREEDGM AGAINST “CRW: CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUITH NO tENT (U5. CONSTITUTION)? RESULTING FROM OYE RESIPAINT THREATS (By: 4 at AFoT BtH AMEUD MENT (U.S. CON STITUTION) 6. FREEDOM panic Wha Bb PERSO yea Atta y gy Sontutioy Bessuc wor. ZT AMEN DEM “ AFFORDEO By; ath ENDMENT (Si cON SITU DIS PARAGEMENT= FROM :ABOOE AEN pup “ OM/RIGHTS RESERV . EQUAL PROTECHION (VIOLATIONS): p 9 CONSTITUTION ) 24 "EITHER PUBLIC/PRIVATE ; 10 ASCORE Wakes arco RRING WARD FROM SEEKING AUDIEWCEGS ; ; DS’ SAFETY AND RELIEE? (Ws.44tH AMENDMENT? A I-TS NOT THE ZDAHO SHATE CONSTHUTION ; AND -U.s. C0 "WARD AS A RESULT OF CONTINUED. zwei DBNcies por ‘Veen HEN Walch Maver ATIONS, BROUGHT UPON SUCH ATROCITIES ALSO IN VIOLATION OF THE DECLARATION OF TNDPPENDECE EVEN? AND 7 A. ~ [HasT refosed Foy assert laws tie most wholesome and "necessey Be tie ble ? Be (anti) assent [Affirmed decision [iN FAVOR oF sovee p lec A * 0 . wy, L ‘ ~ EIGNJIs oO Ran EN For vo} 989 bso aS APE LIBERALLY (ONSTRUED (U5, . | Bes eB arr easier aes canbe es SPL HEDREMEY( S99 8-4 S05) et. Sea] 1 CONTINUED VIOLATION’ AN Way permet cee D. 1S NOT THE KoNST TOT ONS [OF TbAHOS ARTICLE-YT :sectt PROHIBITED<ConpaRE U.s.cousrsrrres Wen Coren ntttes (8 RESTRAINT OF TRADE — AND ARTICLE SHSUcl.C] AT. 2S2; ART. 3SS092> ou, Rema E TELE ‘BIL, 20) 1) ET! ks NoT Sach COMPARE 2, CONST) Turon, ARTICLES 14 83) BUCECSBE, ALSO: