No. 20-5148
Robert James Ossawa Wood v. California
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process false-testimony no-contest-plea plea-withdrawal standing unlawful-evidence unlawfully-obtained-evidence
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was petitioner held to answer for trial based on false testimony and unlawfully obtained evidence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ee eee I WAS PETITIONER HELD TO ANSWER FOR TRIAL BASED ON FALSE TESTIMONY AND UNLAWFULLY OBTAINED EVIDENCE ? II WAS PETITIONER PROVIDENTLY ADVISED OF HIS FEDERAL AND STATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PRIOR TO ENTERING A NO CONTEST PLEA TO A CHARGE OF RAPE ? Iii WAS THERE AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION IN THE DENIAL OF PETITIONER'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW HIS PLEA OF NO CONTEST ? Iv WAS PETITIONER'S NO CONTEST PLEA INVALID . AND IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL AND STATE RESTRICTIONS IN FELONY CASES ? . See: APPENDI xX E $$ 6
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-14
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2020-07-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 21, 2020)
Attorneys
California
Taylor Thuy Nguyen — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Taylor Thuy Nguyen — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent