Keith Hoglund v. Ron Neal, Warden
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
Whether the lower court(s) violated Keith Hoglund's substantive and procedural due process rights
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Issue I: Whether the lower court(s) violated Keith Hoglund’s substantive and procedural due process rights by their holding(s) that there was no reasonable probability that without the hearsay testimony of the experts the trial would have come out differently; thereby violating the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, and Fourteenth Constitutional amendments for the united States. Petitioner answers: Yes Issue II: Whether Keith Hoglund’s substantive and procedural due process rights were violated when the lower court(s) found the admission of expert vouching testimony in this matter “harmless” under the circumstances and facts of this case, thereby violating the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, and Fourteenth Constitutional amendments for the united States. Petitioner answers: Yes : 3