Issue I: Whether the lower court(s) violated Keith Hoglund 's substantive and
procedural due process rights by their holding(s) that there was no reasonable
probability that without the hearsay testimony of the experts the trial would have
out differently; thereby violating the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth,
Eleventh, and Fourteenth Constitutional amendments for the united States.come

Issue II: Whether Keith Hoglund 's substantive and procedural due process rights
violated when the lower court(s) found the admission of expert vouching
testimony in this matter "harmless " under the circumstances and facts of this
thereby violating the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, and Fourteenth
Constitutional amendments for the united States.were
case

Whether the lower court(s) violated Keith Hoglund's substantive and procedural due process rights