No. 20-5183

Keith Hoglund v. Ron Neal, Warden

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-amendments constitutional-rights due-process expert-testimony fourteenth-amendment harmless-error hearsay-evidence procedural-rights sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court(s) violated Keith Hoglund's substantive and procedural due process rights

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Issue I: Whether the lower court(s) violated Keith Hoglund’s substantive and procedural due process rights by their holding(s) that there was no reasonable probability that without the hearsay testimony of the experts the trial would have come out differently; thereby violating the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, and Fourteenth Constitutional amendments for the united States. Petitioner answers: Yes Issue II: Whether Keith Hoglund’s substantive and procedural due process rights were violated when the lower court(s) found the admission of expert vouching testimony in this matter “harmless” under the circumstances and facts of this case, thereby violating the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, and Fourteenth Constitutional amendments for the united States. Petitioner answers: Yes : 3

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-04
Waiver of right of respondent Ron Neal to respond filed.
2020-06-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2020)

Attorneys

Keith Hoglund
Keith Hoglund — Petitioner
Ron Neal
Stephen Richard Creason — Respondent