Whether an affirmative statement entitles Mr. Barnes to the consultation required by Roe v. Flores-Ortega

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | . 1. Whether an affirmative statement that Mr. Barnes wished to remain in the county jail ; for the critical ten-day period entitles Mr. Barnes to the consultation required by Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 120 S.Ct. 1029 (2000)? ; | 2. Whether Henderson v. Morgan, 96 S.Ct. 2253 (1976) provides federal support for Mr. Bares’ invalid state conviction to establish a miscarriage of justice under AEDPA’s exception of McQuiggin v. Perkins, 133 S.Ct. 1924 (2013)? ; 3. Whether actual innocence extends to the critical elements of a crime in a change-of. plea proceeding when that burden of proof must be distinguished from a trial proceeding? . ii