No. 20-519
State Bar of California, et al. v. Lenore L. Albert-Sheridan
Tags: 11-usc-523(a)(7) attorney-discipline bankruptcy bankruptcy-discharge circuit-split federal-courts kelly-v-robinson public-protection statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
ERISA Privacy
ERISA Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Related Cases:
20-6081
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether payments ordered by the California Supreme Court as a condition of an attorney's discipline, imposed to protect the public, are non-dischargeable in chapter 7 bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(7)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether payments ordered by the California Supreme Court as a condition of an attorney’s discipline, imposed to protect the public, are non-dischargeable in chapter 7 bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(7)?
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-19
Brief of respondent Lenore Albert in opposition filed.
2020-11-19
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Lenore Albert.
2020-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 19, 2020)
Attorneys
Lenore Albert
Lenore Albert — Respondent
The State Bar of California, et al.
Suzanne Celia Grandt — The State Bar of California, Petitioner