Christian Rodriguez v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Reno, et al.
Whether the Court recognizes that Law Enforcement and the Court cannot simply expect to use illegally obtained evidence despite Miranda violations
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1) usher) HRM DAR-US ARizowA 14 Viol AED by Lo Cn lekeemetDORE The INVESTICATION, 1S $e Court!Nor HAWDATED “To DSHISS Fis CASE , [2)_ tn HiRAwDA Us ArRLZOWA (I96b) URE INET The Qurts ‘Balin shoes Soon 95 A Sepa et FORMS ABE Liu En Force ment Muat STep (| QUESTION, & one MIRADA IS Violbren andthe Court Rules 4RaLt+ was LN PaeT ViolAeD, ond-Huhe Rules Mt Eurdence OBTWAED CAA Kot PRUSED, Chan te Disrelet PrrTpRiey Bhiné OP (A) Does tho Court feeegnize kat Lied Enforcement and “the Couet Cons Net Stse-Pre Cxpecled te Sat Fergal Afow-Mi Gvidence Cte) ae UirandaViol ATQ0s. ‘S) Af fale ony CiReunisrmveES 10 Uohic Meranda. H Re Violate. | 7