No. 20-5192
Scott Allan Moser v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
IFP
Tags: appellate-counsel federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel invited-error-doctrine martinez-framework martinez-v-ryan procedural-default sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether procedurally defaulted claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are excusable under the framework established by Martinez v. Ryan
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. Under the Sixth Amendment, are procedurally defaulted claims of excusable under the framework established by Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012)? 2
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2020)
Attorneys
Scott Allan Moser
Valarie Linnen — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Valarie Linnen — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al.
Rebecca Rock McGuigan — Office of Florida Attorney General, Respondent
Rebecca Rock McGuigan — Office of Florida Attorney General, Respondent