Whether the court below erred in dismissing petitioner's claims challenging the constitutionality of certain federal statutes and government actions

No question identified. : Sa, 1 DOF a bh SET 4 Sayre ae ait i CDSE S fly _— ~S ee “ANS Panna Ad. — terns Boe SER EAS CSE vee HGS aeeseecnee et SH THE VON(S) PRESENTED. 5 =, VSNT ORES: Oni EX UN’ N's73: Ee SUPREME COURT} Se FRESH OPWIVAB FS LAIG)/ STITU TIONAL TY OF JEN COURT 'T @ oes DES wT BNO Hob Nie + REDSATS -myFa AL | COT BEN SS WMos Mik ES WepiGrececre: | YN EORERAFLAY CiOR g EGRET? BET Uerstf t RANT O: MMiLeren sree 6. Aiea Qxstel pope Te}® BESS SHOU SE PemencAMW Aer, + OuUR Const BG CFI? FE SYE ROSS NS ot EM UBS x pie rien), ConlSrir ep ere EVE OESCB VAR IOXTVS Sec FA QOS UNOWAL<AME ema ALsoe VA Brs® LABS 1 Ao si AN pees _ CMRM TS, (ESOS MADR TE. Arh a eLAss. RVC CURRENT. CLASS Fittte On Ute? SSS s S Jr Re OE THE IME LF) NARCoNC Amétp MERON SET Og ART LITER SOEs Pepe. Peraings ies, aOR ehnates Se Geievanices rn Ree cgteee wen Tae ReGHT. 26 THE set CES. CANN RE E Goveanimenlz: FoR =4 Reese Ge THE =MET . FoR, xan Te) Feed EX cA Ae See OW Amenemeny PPS50°UVES FD 0ES PP OIEWS 1 TSNCS ee FEDER AKC CWEBIS UA RES Cape PLAC! EW” wurkeRsdinele:'* eke; NSRY: Bee HEV ADIT S \ oft -L. Th Sera) ee Meep, Ta.0\ FEA FOS. NIL,» AMUSE IN SEIPURE> oF “Ong Ab Sf Tous FERAL IDS, (RE 1 FE FIT Wotan SV A803,.fRPOUCT. APTER TA Be SULTING GE MVENO MEE EMSS" Ce AER TO PIRArYy FS Li i a ene § MAY ca ER PERSIE Depeves oo: orse OW 4; MMO TREE ere CESSO REGU SSDHEN 0 CESS BYEL Po0GSa. 7 THE Ev law wi DEF AVO TE GFAN MED Mev AT K ve oF Covey | CLES; iL (WIE 0K FriVEs MED ZINE? Evert K 18S WeLATED MER ES ATIY OG A Even wits VNOT LiS'Tep i Con RHE RIGHT TO, Cease PLAN EV RELWIGsops BEC verre, ChANOT BE EXER Vv “Ears WHEY A PERS nm BY LATED . is “J , nT SECTION 7 15 Wid THE ZJugrsprcqo ® AMevemenr Iv, States WNP SVBTECT Te AND & Oe STHTE EN THE vMTEp STH UV-TEO STHTES © chee Ren ip=s OFTHE | EFSON © ‘ty F, ARE CTiZeVsS DEPRIVES ANY i OF MLO = os THEFEO / THty RESIDE + utr DUE FRe SS py QNR2-E SAT . te ATO JI WTA om <a = -T sh? aes m BE Tiin OF Fl GINA MOT Ein aha Lear CW, Mons. ; HE Cab Unrreousrhtes oF fl db td BAaT pes HTH? Bi WSOPE THRE “th EW TALE 06 F EMER Lp Oy 2 F imo, WH NOD racaf fee DUE fEOCESS ° 1 BRR RRS MOD PasnTie CASE... SANTO Fi . STURN! s , 1.0. COURT. WV Ee ary ae + AGO oon heme a . ; cee . rye rreins ct Balk 4 a 7 ; AVA \ iteead " Taso IngingIAeD Bn BH op Oa SEC ONG 9 SMEPUE ONE WiRCe Te CIS TING -< LE Febee nc, LecaecZNT A x SY PERO EN FOR be hed, KECK MipNaiey. AS. THES GB IS Mepcivitly ry 24 LARS Rags’ Oh TE) vey Finer, MER NFR 2 er POOUILIKERA WS SEN EACTS i Bis Doaaes ee cae hvy MOU SiSKEDOZAL23s BEG Stay 2. Be Cyicp Bane Ge oh INRA CAS ES ICR ROUSE ie. Rees =P TNs * Zz SINC UIIOULD. ERO SE”. Mg RE ORD > a EREORPS. | THIS La Cone, word ban NRK VRECORP Sfp! ALON “SRP Hyp t/ Yap CAS VRECQ2O Sf oe ie i, RECREBT TONER Ee ate ep aa W/VABIS , ANP,“ COREA TE CTR ‘fe 8 (Mep CAC HWM IE) Nore nh) 6 8 Byd SS ETON SSR oes Se Si weds Sai A eT A Bion SvBs 7 a HE. Mtns By Oboe HOGS Sun, MEME. COURT geet’ as SEAS REE AUR, CMO OM Rae rn ee SSYOCK 2 EMME aS ot