Lamar Moore, aka Kane v. United States
SocialSecurity Securities
should-moore's-plea-and-conviction-be-vacated
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i) Shoulda'd Muoce’s Pleq and convichon under Count Ohe bé Vachted in hight of Rehait Vu ted Sfafes, 139 $.C4. 2191 (201q), where the indictment faled , allege Moore's Knowledge of Ws Status aS a Prohibsted person, ind Moore S$ Plea Was wot inte Mgeat mastiuch 4s he ues wot cdysed Tha Knotsledoe of his Status las aa Element oF The oF Fe0SEZ 4) DiD Moore Ceceive the ineffective assistance OF Counse| When he wes adused to Withdaw his Merjtocious Challenge to his Careec OCead er Status ? 3) Shoulolg't Moore's Sentence Le Yecated Whee fhe strict Cort aid not and, in view of the inadeguate recocd, Could not Myke Findings OF 4acts Supforting the imposed enhaacernents ? ) whether 18 USC. Gad @) provides For Crimunal fenaltits . To telenS Who possess FireacmS 14 intecstate hice of oF absent Proof that they knew of ther fe 4 us, The Lireacm's Movement in interstate CoMmere ,