No. 20-5197

Lamar Moore, aka Kane v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: career-offender-status criminal-penalties due-process factual-findings ineffective-assistance-of-counsel interstate-commerce plea-waiver second-amendment sentencing-enhancement sentencing-enhancements
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

should-moore's-plea-and-conviction-be-vacated

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i) Shoulda'd Muoce’s Pleq and convichon under Count Ohe bé Vachted in hight of Rehait Vu ted Sfafes, 139 $.C4. 2191 (201q), where the indictment faled , allege Moore's Knowledge of Ws Status aS a Prohibsted person, ind Moore S$ Plea Was wot inte Mgeat mastiuch 4s he ues wot cdysed Tha Knotsledoe of his Status las aa Element oF The oF Fe0SEZ 4) DiD Moore Ceceive the ineffective assistance OF Counse| When he wes adused to Withdaw his Merjtocious Challenge to his Careec OCead er Status ? 3) Shoulolg't Moore's Sentence Le Yecated Whee fhe strict Cort aid not and, in view of the inadeguate recocd, Could not Myke Findings OF 4acts Supforting the imposed enhaacernents ? ) whether 18 USC. Gad @) provides For Crimunal fenaltits . To telenS Who possess FireacmS 14 intecstate hice of oF absent Proof that they knew of ther fe 4 us, The Lireacm's Movement in interstate CoMmere ,

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2020)

Attorneys

Lamar Moore
Lamar Moore — Petitioner
Lamar Moore — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent