Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions

No question identified. : Z G2 « QO} > J : je > . Frey = 60 PAL fans QIN Se te AOIN Corte os cules * (6 SS.414.021 nD arta a VN OSO PESOS ee AO On 2 ae o 8 ‘ . wt Oar 21 ose in Fi OS BSG ANS) ONAN GS 62S Sa F ere AON oO Otsn2$ pa DAootrs SOT Ore Aolvyress oe gee je = may ” § * ‘ to+e Po md, 43. Up: AL L228 sk bat bin Ser Dal. bres Pers. 22S LON ote gs se re “Syn ate Peston . G v f a . ' af Q O04 = oy EBACE snes CL¥ CSUN Pa OD 0 SN StS No yn 2 Nw Gn NekenT ae, a w AGL GAAS OA AARON IMES Wy SO Och > Ops. . , * QO” dex 6 ONEIDA EZ. C26, xT 2s On¢ wa Sn na Ht 2S Sx A ZIPS NA eB BOL sO 0 DY UAW Nae Om “ oS In Y t/ U/ v . ? nN Z ‘ « j NA? 2, i Oy So “ro GECMAWC AS 9 = AX, pas MUON MARE Orn Qacmoe 9 PAOCS Ot ney,» VA na 2. Ve Nantes Conoste it Pssp¢e ONS NA Of ov v2 OLA Tran, Feo ~ hold, 24 Bn aa Sa OSL ON & AQ ~“\yn2 On/ec rs RAS LEO A 2 CO *Nn te ols Sos riba crs Lp hes de ves : J Cc) 2. “ Ve y + a x . Vy On? ra ELL. C a LL 7, GPSO 2AAISAO DOA Pe etry PNAS 6 ems os BOM 2am 6f; Possro-€ 2 ee Yi U . # é Se ‘ 2 : . : ~ ’ ’ ¢ 2 AN ‘ * ~ ~ Ads ATVOG IN weveFiyore Wore Coa PAs 22 G0 Prn22 = OOnS enSere okey 2 SvscKesion OC > a aK CS , < tS _ ae fbr oF UN NEAR ppt di Bi L\ Sor i , Kad SB72S, Vn for Par he tO 4rd ok A Q GS ted Hebd BOS Oss Aman cfm erode Jot A PPPS C200 che, SST A