Whether the New York crime of attempt to commit a crime qualifies as a 'crime of violence

estion(s) presented 0. oe ee ON 1. Whether The Nei? York KRnse cf oMemot ko ; Commit een CAM, quali &es OAS OA OaMme. F violence Whelinec Very ag CON Chusions From diferent Circuits Creoke OL Awersityot Sectences Amana federal Pi sane Lotn ike Gtenses Q> Well os Smiliac Prior COA GRONS | : Uherelay O deRacdone pleads Opuihy hoy definisen , Lacks “the. sntent TS “Comaneh tre Underlying anme wenrders Ane. Skank Gonclusion. 22 1 ee 7 ne ; . . . . _ ~ \ CerriFaote Fo Sewice 2 2 7 Ce A . 07 4 La Append x ea , “Voble & Autronhes Cases — Gav v IELN.S. Hac F.3d Sa Cand cir 3005) : Kaok Vv Aschrof + 384 F3d GY Cd cir Ja04) Nock Coiina v Alford . Yoo us AS LIGIC) “Pespie v Faster 1Q@NWY.Ad 150 Cigeny : People v shason BA NW Ad As IAG) Uniled States v Dinkins Gag €3d 34 CY ae Joi) . Unied Sicles vy Dozier SYS E.3d 180 CUR aie Jor) | Sotutes and Rules BUS. CS Fay | NW. ‘Penal Loo 3 \10,.00 N.Y. Pena law 3 180.1003 Gudebine_ oo GQoS.3.G6. 3 4R1.3 “Vurisdichkon : “he. dare on hich The Uinted States Casck F Appeats fr “ne South Girant decided Oy COE En Bone wes denied by Whe United States Cauck oF Appeats Ta the fart Cireuk an flpril 14, 3030 A Copy d the Cequest tor o relneanng or rearing En Bone aswell as oO copy dt We order Deny rg, Said Tequest O PPEOS at Appencdhx ‘ A” “ur isdkehon Lf this court is : , ASUS... 1asy ay, MveneA Under " Stotemment & Tne Case “We Petitioner pleaded Gusta ihe posse ssion oF ron Rreacm lou a Previously Coomcked Felon in vidohon FS U.a.c. 39 SAQro. F violence Under USSG 3481.3, é Oa Noth Rearc\inn Gomenon Lass “Robbeny pond @ a NewsYorW convckon Ler GHemple d ass auit in the fest degree iM Mralarion ot me pens Lau Sechan 110.08 and section VAQ. ON, “TWto0 Price comes cf Violente pout respect Te OD tastart Violotion £ 19U.5.0, 49 Gaa Gyo Oss.ens o nose oFense level : 3H olen (Se, One Prior Game LK Vodlence Ass. GH » Kense \evel SF Ao . “The. ‘Petiioner ‘Ss corkest ng “We Districk Courts edlor orien trot The Pehboners donviction ine State. & Pew Yor Cor artternpted asawk in We Set Degree. does poor * Cokegor coy" quate Gs OA Crime & Viclence, We Districk Cou overruled Ane Paiikoners Ahyeckion TA Ke PSR QRORHLiNG +e, “ Owe meted Assault Os O anme. Violence. ; on De peak a Re Daetin Cir cuk Cork o& Agpeos re ; . +a the defendant must hove Ane," ratent AS aom mi a enne,* ond Arar NnereRre Are deRn dont Deods Cprthy —-k. he SopeciWe intent, _ {7 Chief Audge Gregory Avssented NOKAQ Anis . Sreud le a stroiant fatward Qease, Faun Grouse precedent Linvted Soles v Dozier B48 F.2d \BO (445 air Qo requires oo defeadark “ro ack WHY the apecihic intent te Commit “Tre Underlying erme ead Me. York, pects defendants to plead gusty —Yo erses Uthen “Whey do nek — indeed Goma! — “Possess the speaiha went se coramy tine ; Underlying come. , “Pe cause Res York Attemed io ovecbecad ea a Crecoy Loond ove ceversed Te. Disine! Courks . decision Class \Fying “tre pehtioners Rend Wor Crrlemoted Ficst JDearee. @ssaulh Co nickoN Qs Oo Game F Violence. -o? “Reasons Yor Cranting InelWeit “Were exists Q ciccuit aphk on Whether o. New York attempt Care gor coy quelhes as Oo ame & Violence. A Unique Peatue of tris Nee Yack Lag thes Permits Oo deen dont te Pleod MT TS O|empb 0q O came Unichh tou definition aonnot ke conmitted inten Wonally Sach a> Gem fed reci-less endangerment, Pleose. See Vecple v foster Sas NE .ad BOOLWY 1QG . AH On event “The Major iy he pone af The forcky | Cirourk Court F Appeois ( C3. Gresry dissenting answered Kes qpveston inne oir Matwe ra iQ, shorts AeLendant Bntering O Plea cf Quilty " Necessarily Admits +e POBESS!CQ, the Fequisibe. Speave iment. . Te Linited Sicks Courts & Argpests Ex the Hed Crrousre sond perrops more. Compas ing 7 Me Second caret | \nowe reached A.ferent Conclusions | (see Knapik v Asherofi 364 F.3d OH (34 air goou) hol diag “noe New York Conviction Rar atempled peck \ess ossauik cous Not Solishy “he coteogn cal Oproady) iso, Gil vy oS. 480 F3d 8a (And cir AdOS) Ieldiag “hod BO Mental Stake Qo