Michael Anthony Dobson v. Colin D. Stolle, et al.
DueProcess
Whether the administration of a state prison facility's policy of routinely recording phone calls between prisoners and their attorneys violates the prisoners' due process rights
Questions) PResented \Jhaae speihionce i Vis Gonplasit aequested Rebvikal phone alls, beluees Pahbonee PD Dein dats to weillenr elaias depMorieg Ore was Yas enge by Deeidauh Me Lave, Te Covel Rendeved Judgemest withost conBidie ete, . yale of Une call iyetion e@ Qea Qe echiel onke Rule Sad which WAS. erroncouly denied: Whee re Admidistasbion of A stake, priser) Aree ly With Roce qlaced AS wrods (Raa ontly me pis, wien} due process of Law, Ree Yaey Viable? . 2) ze an infoamaut ib special eclahodship with We ahake where dlr pedes bNidprke Had Wie intoonaule Ketivibes, If discovered could cesulh ja kLipeat foe 1 oP We iMfoomaab, Ts ih diMrcatk Lo AGE, h person would ailist Qe Sudn &k daniq e2.ons Postion Abseal sre, quamibee ob pessoninl saleby Maviery : MAG such quaenatles, ules Ynsee is so cleae & Qik -be as individual’ \R Ann Weeeky Vie alake May wok, consistent with Yue Constlolan, awa wall Nuay Pom Yue beng hin ems Hrey? 9) vuleze ne stake has in AS turtody K Poder, Mid lag Lalcesd Asay his | Aoiliky be aded om bis own behal®. tree shake Wie Racht to Yan Due Vat A\ ns ts por his \R ts danigse Which could ead in bis dead Ww ovt rModiig hua Due Paccess Righ's, TsYuis suet of AcHOA Wkaly bo Qise . Lo Yue Conscious ~shockang \suel