Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and individual judges thereof acted as the ultimate fact-finders (a Texas habeas corpus proceeding) by denying Petitioner's state application for writ of habeas corpus on the merits without the appellate court and purposes thereof, thereby demanding the cause be sent to the trial court, the original fact-finder, in Petitioner's habeas corpus proceedings, so the trial judge could make written findings of fact and conclusions of law for the appellate court to have a factual basis to base its final determination on a violation of the U.S. 6th Amendment

No question identified. : a Qrueskions Ocesenked Q) Wherrer Wage Wenrag Counk Of Carmninal Aggealy and individual yudges Hnereok as Me Ullimate Lack Gabars (A Texas Yobeas Cos gus grocer Ling alouse’S Mneic discretion Gad ecced wher Naty andlor re courk denied Peliionas Skake Agelicakion For Werk of habeas Cocgus on Ahe meriks Withouk Mrz Aggellake Court ond purses rhereok Cie sk Cemanding Me couse So ehe teal courk Me eciginal Loa ftnder ia Wernas Waloeas Cangus Proceedings Pte Atfecd | Whe Wial Sudge ho make cocikken Lindinas of Lack and Condusios of law -So he appetdate Courk would & Lackual loasis “ko loase Vhs final delerminakion on. 2Ea Violation of Hhe U.S. (UMA Ameardmerk. C2) Whether We “Tees Cours Of Criminol Ageeals and ndiul dual yudgyes Kyereol albused theie discrelron . When Ahe Courk andlor ane indivi kul dudges Mreres€ Laled and Anus ected loy ack affording, vekkoner a hearing aS Promulgated Loy Abig Couch in “Vaoasend v Sain 3924.8. AGS CAD. When ik Laas Urlicquted Lak Rebbonan had alleged Lacks ;f beue, Word enkde him xo celie€. BeLove ne Courk andlor individual yrdges Mheeek dened Qelones’s Sake Agolicetion For wrk Of Waloeasy Corpus on Mae menmks . A vinlahon ofthe US. MAK Amardmend. Rerdon For LANK Of Madaus © | Lisk of Saskes , Radaoners Alien *€% Cabkon * \W13%%0 Connally Uni BWI EM 63% Kenedy (TK. WEF . Hesgondenks + AY “Texas Cou Of Criminal Aggoals AO"! Vo. (UMA Skreek Askin , Texas AA qQol OQ) Shhason Keller Ocesiling Judge Courk Of Criminal Agees\s 2X\ Ld. 14M Skveek . Auska TK. TRNol S Mike Keaslear urge Cours Of Criminal Apgeals ZO W. WM Skreet Auskia PT. AZNO/ GW Borcher ?. Wesvey Tease Cou of etm al Axpreals Do\ WwW. (An sheet Aus (Tx. VEN CS) Beck Cichenlsor ( Wadsge Courk Of Criminal Appeals Zo l D. Wr Sreek Auskia (Tx. TWO Ralkon For Wak ok Martoms 0, il , Lisk of Rarkes Respondents % GG) Kein @ Meany Sudae Caunk o& Crerrtnal Aogeals 20S Gd. iW Seed Audin (Texas MA }D| ; eo David Ayesse\\ Wursae Courk 0€ Cpiminal Aggeals DoY wid Skeeek Aoskia oTexas Mxrol @&) Weary Cou Keel WTudge Cour OF CAiminal Agpeals 2ol\ w. WX Skreet Ausan > Texas 9870\ CA) Scokk Walker Is TWarge Com O€ Camaal Agee? 20S Gd: \AM Broek Avstan (TeKes nyo . CA oO) Michale Slaughter WTUdqe Counk OF Carmrna Ageeals = DOL We. ian Stree’+ ARNa p Vexas N10 | Peddron For Wak Of Maidamus p. Ww Table Bf ConkendS (>) x ~ PiNierS Relos 5 . oe = Bl Wuris Kahan . ; : . . o-| Coasktinkonal avd Shakudo ry Reovissns, Xavalve & « e-\ Skakmenk Of Te Case « = ~ e-3 Yoeasons Foc GC anknsy, Mardaws Relief 5 = ” pConduusion — Reayer ew . ; . « e 2 p. 49 “Talole of Authotiies Cihed . Cases P23ES ACE Tnduteies Lac v Guan 3 (23 1S Cera?) . 2-33 Adams UUs. BLS. 204 . * » 2 4 2 * # 0.9 Alied Chemical Comp. y Oaifln Tac 4ug us 23 CBO) 2. PQ American tomestar of Cancasker FAC SOSBA YO CrEx Zool) = P.B Avxwesican Lidmagcaghic Co. uy WercKimerster PAA US, O3 CIRM) © p.t0 Austia and NWO co. y Cluck M7 SY) Gos cry \qoz ye. @ IK, 22 Bayer* v Bullik 397. U36O Udd)y 2. 2 2 2 8 0-31 Garters Like and Cas. Cov v tolled 346 US. 398 Ciesz) o + 0.2 . Basallua Vv Shake SS% sw2O 2 CVER CAM Ago Lanay =. et Beacon “TWheakies ne. U Wesker 3549 US S60 Ciasq) ~ + p30 Beawmonk Bark N-A. u Butler Wie SwI2d 223 CTeyigall o . p-28 Berhlehan Shighwidng Conv ALR. (to 62% (26 Cust cn ia) =p 2 Ex athe Blue 230 $03) VSL Crex Crim Ago. Lop\y . 0-131 Bodke V Conneckculk 41 6. CK AGO Claw) s 6 oe (3 Eraxkon Vv Qunn BOZ $424 Ig Ctex.crimAge ial). Palle, 2% . Bearas River Artrorthy Ny ky ef Gralhan DSA SDB AW CTex tal) 6 ° ° eo 2 8 PR AQ Beoorn v AWN Bud os. 44d Clas2) ee 2 B8Q Burkion V Yorman &2N SWIM QUES CTeX. Crim Age. 1972) « p.2¥ Ta ce Comybell wu F3d N30 2. 2. LY pnl2 elon fos Uorrk of Madauws — V en cases pages Carey VU Cighus 435 US. 24n CLIAVR) 6 = s+ p3% Carell U Beko 270 EF. Suge M2 CHO Te Mt) . + p13 Cheney V USOC. or Ok. of Calurbia (24 s.Cx 251% C2004). 9 2, Hey 29 Kn ce Clyetwood 16S US. 4US 5 = > + Ex Parke Clear SAB $w2D WU CrExcimAge LAB) @ = PIL . Cale Uo Que