No. 20-5216
Brent Anderson v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure davis-v-united-states fact-review federal-rule-criminal-procedure federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure gvr judicial-procedure plain-error questions-of-fact standard-of-review
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-11-13
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are questions of fact cognizable on plain error review under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED L Are questions of fact cognizable on plain error review under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b)? [Petitioner requests GVR in light of Davis v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 1060 (2020)] i
Docket Entries
2020-12-18
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2020-11-16
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Davis</i> v. <i>United States</i>, 589 U. S. ___ (2020) (<i>per curiam</i>).
2020-10-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-10-09
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-09-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 13, 2020.
2020-09-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 11, 2020 to October 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-12
Response Requested. (Due September 11, 2020)
2020-08-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2020)
Attorneys
Brent Anderson
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent