No. 20-5218

Daniel Page v. Renee Baker, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel medical-condition ninth-circuit plea-bargaining pre-sentence-motion trial-counsel
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court should have granted Mr. Page's pre-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred by denying a certificate of appealability on the question of whether the trial court should have granted Mr. Page’s pre-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea where the plea was not made knowingly, freely, and voluntarily? 2. Whether the Ninth Circuit erred by denying a certificate of appealability on the question of whether Mr. Page received ineffective assistance of trial counsel where his attorney failed to adequately investigate Mr. Page’s medical condition prior to entering his plea? i

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent Renee Baker to respond filed.
2020-07-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2020)

Attorneys

Daniel Page
Courtney Brooke KirschnerFederal Public Defender, District of Nevada, Petitioner
Courtney Brooke KirschnerFederal Public Defender, District of Nevada, Petitioner
Renee Baker
Geordan GoebelNevada Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Geordan GoebelNevada Attorney General's Office, Respondent