No. 20-5221
Arthur James Martin v. Florida
IFP
Tags: brady-violation capital-trial criminal-procedure cumulative-error cumulative-error-analysis giglio-violation ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-relief strickland-test trial-counsel
Key Terms:
Takings DueProcess Punishment Privacy
Takings DueProcess Punishment Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether trial counsel's failure to investigate and present evidence that significantly undermines the State's case is deficient performance that results in prejudice?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether trial counsel’s failure to investigate and present evidence that significantly undermines the State’s case is deficient performance that results in prejudice? 2. Whether a state court is required to conduct a cumulative error analysis of violations of Brady, Giglio, and/or Strickland? i
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-09-01
Reply of petitioner Arthur Martin filed.
2020-08-28
Brief of respondent State of Florida in opposition filed.
2020-07-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2020)
Attorneys
Arthur Martin
State of Florida
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent