No. 20-5233

Michael R. Burns v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-31
Status: Rehearing
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure dna-evidence dna-fabrication due-process evidence fingerprint-fabrication habeas-corpus newly-discovered-evidence post-conviction-relief
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-03-19 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether newly discovered evidence of DNA and fingerprint fabrication establishes a violation of due process and a basis for a new trial

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Adda\y agen ors Ne Repos Counser bad RecaQ\ A Wander e Milness . Qend brent He sayencin | on Oo eo Vet Shen & establishes newly discovered evidence, nn A An d Ki : int Fabricati ere Ingerprin abpricatlon $F Tompson Vs Calderon 120 ¥.38 1045 CAR (a7) | | STS OOS. Regeads Court Wave Tord ASB AOW 8S WAR Aer, VS v, Caomre SO LedDA GST NEG WS CAB GABMIEO Wc Who AS PBs \ 8 X wero WK BATS Yi ve. Cane Naw Q caacian SO, NBD © oN YS Nox AN ers \ \ Q We Monic a Q & SS e. Ava 7 \veawes. Xv Ba Wee S o\ eee SSG AA Cree Qt EAP EROS ; PRopew Vroc cee Nn New Ce Va ¥ Ne. AWN BW Ray ; Wwe DOrveraier Co vRT “ee USw Baackarss E3877 (ass) . orev DNA And Fingerprint Fabrication _ see US.N Ra d\es SSB FAA 363 BSC Ciw 107 7) ) II. : .

Docket Entries

2021-03-22
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner DENIED.
2021-03-03
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.
2021-02-18
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner.
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2020)

Attorneys

Michael R. Burns
Michael R. Burns — Petitioner
Michael R. Burns — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallSullivan & Cromwell LLP, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallSullivan & Cromwell LLP, Respondent