No. 20-5234
Jeremiah Bryant v. District of Columbia Office of Human Rights, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law administrative-procedure civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination human-rights-act retaliation standing
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the D.C. Court of Appeals erred in affirming the underlying decision of the D.C. Superior Court based on the Office of Human Rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the D.C. Court of Appeals erred in affirming the underlying decision of the D.C. Superior Court based on the Office of Human Rights. The Court found no probable cause in discrimination or retaliation. At the very least, there should have been a split decision based on the guidelines of the Office of Human Rights rules. ;
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-31
Waiver of right of respondent Borger Management, Inc. to respond filed.
2020-08-19
Waiver of right of respondent DC Office of Human Rights, et al. to respond filed.
2020-06-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2020)
Attorneys
Borger Management, Inc.
David E. Nagle — Jackson Lewis PC, Respondent
David E. Nagle — Jackson Lewis PC, Respondent
DC Office of Human Rights, et al.