No. 20-5246
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights conviction-review court-jurisdiction criminal-procedure due-process jurisdictional-challenge search-and-seizure standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in denying the defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained through a warrantless search
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , | . __ ; hs fo intenet. Or Fe deve] joaisdicteon whoa) : | the FOL report States “Methed oF | | a2 Hoes Cana eusdence Be saved ? Chen bo th : ~ Tha § bs toa fe and Distr set Ted. c Sar © There “ns ~ Me” prea le Cause ? Hows Jig the GS Amendu” | -loge’ 745 Power te pre tee Prop: bo. 3B. idhy does The Sixth Ospet Appeal Sart . 944 Ont 323955 pecau sc Defense FHtorn¥ . Did rot. ia the Conviction OF One, . oo. _Defeadant , Qud then rot grant One... ugith pimnetlas Qlase , oe, tr the SxMh s7eo
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-07-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 2, 2020)
Attorneys
Jerry Luke
Jerry Luke — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent