Whether Mr. Burnside's due-process rights were violated and he is entitled to a new trial based on newly-discovered-evidence where the prosecutor knowingly used perjured-testimony

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ARGUMENT I DID THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN AND THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ERRONEQUSL'Y DENIED MR. BURNSIDE'S . REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEAUABILITY IN THIS HABEAS CORPUS CASE WHERE JURISTS OF REASON coup cUearty DEBATE WHETHER MR. BURNSIDE'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS WERE VIOUATED AND . HE IS ENTITLED TO A NEW TRIAU BASED ON NEULy DISCOVERED EVIDENCE, WHERE THE PROSECUTOR KNOWINGLY USED PERIJURED TESTIMONY FROM LEAH WATSON, WHOSE TESTIMONY WAS BASED ON THREATS AND INTIMIDATION; AND THAT JUDGE FARAH'S FACTUAL FINDINGS ARE NOT ENTITUED TO A PRESUMPTION OF CORRECTNESS? Fa