Is it unconstitutional for the IRS to punish or retaliate against citizens without legal foundation?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) At every step in the process, is it unconstitutional for Respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue (IRS) to be punish or retaliate against any citizen with adverse decisions without foundation in the Rule of Law for reasons solely and wholly outside the scope of its authority?; 2) At every step in the process, is it unconstitutional for Respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue (IRS) to be punish or retaliate against any citizen for exercising their Natural Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances without fear of punishment or retaliation, as reduced to writing in the First Amendment?; : 3) Is it or is it not unconstitutional and a violation of every individual Citizens’ Natural Rights (9th Amendment) and other Constitutional Rights; for the IRS to punish and/or give unfavorable rulings to any person or group for reasons that are solely and wholly outside its authority?; 4) Did Respondent IRS unconstitutionally punish or retaliate against Petitioner Mashak and his wholly owned Sub-Chapter S Corporation, “First National Repossessors, Inc. (FNR) for reasons outside the scope of its authority?; 5) Is the IRS’s sole authority the enforcement of United States Tax Laws pursuant to the Rule of Law?; 6) Was the IRS’s punishment of and retaliation toward members of the TEA Party and other conservative groups and individuals a few years ago, unconstitutional. (This is relevant because Petitioner Mashak was deeply involved in the TEA Party Movement.); 7) Is it unconstitutional, for the US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) to require Pro Se and In Propia Persona litigants to file Motions for Writs of Certiorari without access to Law Libraries because the Government closed them for reasons allegedly related to the COVID-19 crisis?; 8) Is the settled Metaphysics of Natural Law still the guiding philosophy of our government and judiciary? (The organic country our founder’s created was founded upon Natural Law (Laws of Nature, First Paragraph, Declaration of Independence and the 9th Amendment to the organic US Constitution.): 9) Is any attempt by any person to replace Natural Law’s “unalienable Rights of the Individuals with Progressive assertions that “the concept of rights of the individual is “nonsense” (Progressive Democrat President Woodrow Wilson, page 25,