Stephen Henderson v. United States
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Should this Court's decision in United States v. Jones and Carpenter v. United States be applied retroactively under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2253
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Should this Court’s decision in United States v. Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012), (placement of GPS monitoring on a vehicle and cells-site tracking without a warrant constitutes an improper search) and Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. CT. 2206 (2018) (individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cells-site location information and that obtaining such information constitutes a search requiring a warrant), be applied retroactively under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Should a writ of certiorari be granted in light of Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). att