No. 20-5262

Stephen Henderson v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment carpenter-v-united-states cell-site-tracking fourth-amendment habeas-corpus retroactive-application retroactivity search-and-seizure supreme-court-precedent title-28-usc-2253 united-states-v-jones warrantless-search
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should this Court's decision in United States v. Jones and Carpenter v. United States be applied retroactively under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2253

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Should this Court’s decision in United States v. Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012), (placement of GPS monitoring on a vehicle and cells-site tracking without a warrant constitutes an improper search) and Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. CT. 2206 (2018) (individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cells-site location information and that obtaining such information constitutes a search requiring a warrant), be applied retroactively under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Should a writ of certiorari be granted in light of Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). att

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2020)

Attorneys

Stephen Henderson
Stephen Henderson — Petitioner
Stephen Henderson — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent