No. 20-5271
Toshi Edward Willingham v. Catherine S. Bauman, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights district-court due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Patent
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower courts erroneously denied a certificate of appealability in a habeas corpus case
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED , _ 1. DID THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN . DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN AND THE UNITED STATES COURT OF : APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ERRONEOUSLY DENY MR. : WILLINGHAM’S REQUEST FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IN ; THIS HABEAS CORPUS CASE WHERE JURISTS OF REASON COULD CLEARLY DEBATE WHETHER WILLINGHAM’S CONSTITUTIONAL ; RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED? 1
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-30
Waiver of right of respondent Catherine S. Bauman, Warden to respond filed.
2020-09-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2020)
Attorneys
Limited appearance for Catherine S. Bauman, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent