No. 20-5275

Marco Manuel Torres v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-05
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-oath due-process judicial-misconduct judicial-review presidential-power presidential-powers separation-of-powers supreme-court treaty-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment Securities Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the President (Donald Trump) and the elected 9 Supreme Court Justices, with the consent of the Senate, have conspired to not faithfully execute the laws of the United States and breach their oaths of office

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question presented : 1. Whether, the President (Donaid Trump), with the consent of the Senate has conspired with the 9 Supreme Judexes to not execute the laws of the United _ States of America faithfully and breach their oaths in office. 1. Whether, the President (Donald Trump)and the elected 9 Supreme Judexes, with the consent of the Senate, in doing so, hold their office, with their bad behavior, which has been vested in this one Supreme Court and such inferior court, as congress may time to time ordain and establish, to hold their office, and while deny petitioner Torres, Marco M. great writ of Cert. and en banc reh’g, to case number 15-7897, during their good behavior, pursuant of Article 2, section 1-3 of the United States constitution. 2. Whether, the President (Donald Trump) and the elected 9 Supreme Judexes, with the consent of the Senate, hold their office, with their bad behavior, has cause the powers of the judicial vesting treason against petitioner Torres, Marco M. that is consisting only in leying war against the petitioner Torres, Marco M. and in adhering to petitioner Torres, Marco M. enemies, giving them aid comfort, and allowing corruption of blood, or fortiture, excepted not during the life of the petitioner Torres, Marco M. attained. . 3. Whether, the President (Donald Trump) and the elected 9 Supreme Judexes, with the consent of the Senate, hold their office, with their bad behavior, or has : cause discrimination on petitioner Torres, Marco M. federally protected rights, ; and treatise of ordinance 56 session 1, chapter 191 of the year 1900, section 7, of porto Rico, been inforced, shall continue in full force, and that all inhabitant continuing to reside therein who were Spanish subjects ts on the 11th day of April, 1899, then resided in Porto Rico, and their children born subjsequent thereto, shall be deem and held to be citizenss of Porto Rico, and such entitled to the protection of the United States of America, except such as shall have elected to preserve their allegiance to the crown of Spain on or before the 11th day of April, 1900, in accordance with the provision of the treaty of peace between the United States of America as may reside in Porto Rico, shall constitute a body politic under the name of the People of Porto Rico, with governmental powers as inhereafter conferred, and with power to sue and be sued as such. . 4. Whether, the President (Donald Trump) and the elected 9 Supreme Judexes, with the consent of the Senate, in doing so, hold their office, with their bad behavior, has discriminated the laws and ordinance or Porto Rico now in force shall continue in full force effect, except, as altered, amended, or modified hereinafter, or as altered, or modified by military orders and decree in force, when this acts, shall take effect, and so far as the same are not inconsistent or in conflict with the statutory laws of the United States of America, locally inapplicable, or the provision hereof to provide new guards for the Petitioner Torres, Marco M. future and secure in, in which has had been the patient sufferance of Spain and the petitioner Torres, Marco M. and for the people of Spain. 5. Whether, the President (Donald Trump) and the elected 9 Supreme Judexes, with the consent of the Senate, in doing so, hold their office, with their bad behavior, has discriminated against the Petitioner Torres, Marco M. that has been now which ; constrained to Spain and by altering the laws of America and thus breach the treaty act between to country, Spain and the United States of America system, which has repeatedly through history repeated and usurpation of all having indierect objects to the establishment let the facts be submitted to a candid world. 6. Whether, the President (Donald Trump) and the elected 9 Supreme Judexes, with the consent of the Senate, in doing so, hold their office, with their bad behavior, has assented the laws of the United States of America, and Spain to the Petitioner Torres, M

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2020-08-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-07
Waiver of right of respondent Trump, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.
2020-07-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2020)

Attorneys

Marco Manuel Torres
Marco M. Torres — Petitioner
Trump, President of the United States, et al.
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent