Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for violation of the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause

No question identified. : ra -. QUNSTION PRESENTED I. WAS PETITIONER'S FIFTH AMENDMENT COMPULSORY SELF INCRIMINATION WAS VIOLATED BECAUSE THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS GLENN KIRSCHNER AND NIHAR MOHANTY THREATEN TO PROSECUTE PETITIONER'S BABY'S MOTHER [NASTASHA HENDERSON] FOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, IF PETITIONER DID NOT ADMIT GUILT TO: SECOND DEGREE MURDER WHILE ARMED AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE? II.WAS PETITIONER DENIED SIXTH AMENDMENT EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL BY HIS ATTORNEY PAUL SIGNET FOR FAILING TO INVESTIGATE THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF PETITIONER'S PLEA AGREEMENT BEFORE HE PROVIDED PETITIONER MANIFESTLY INCORRECT INFORMATION AND ADVISED PETITIONER TO ENTER A PLEA OF GUILTY TO SAVE HIS BABY'S MOTHER? III. WAS PETITIONER DENIED FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS WHEN HE TRIED TO BRING HIS FACTUAL CONSTITUTION CLAIMS TO THE COURT'S ATTENTION AND THEY REJECT HIS CLAIMS,EVIDENCE AND CONSIDERED HIS CLAIMS PROCEDURALLY BARRED? i