Did the Circuit Court deny Petitioner's Constitutional right for fair Trial?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . f , Did Circuit Court denied Petitioner’s Constitutional right for fair Trial by entering judgment against the law, weight of evidences and facts? 2 , Did Southern District Court of Appeal falsified facts in its Statement/opinion? 3, Did the circuit court erred in allowing to Respondent (who is foreign Nevada’s Corporation) to proceed with his action against Petitioner in the Court of Missouri while being a foreign Corporation and therefore barred by law from accessing Courts of Missouri. Circuit Court failed to apply RSMo Section 351.574 states "no foreign , ; corporation, failing to comply with this chapter, can maintain any suit or action, either legal or equitable, in any of the courts of this state, upon any demand, whether arising out of the contract or tort" RSMO §351.574. ; 4 , Did The circuit court erred in denying Petioner’s request to recognize that Respondent charged usurious interest to Petitioner and that Petitioner had paid usurious interest to Respondent, that Pursuant RSMo 408.030 (2) "Ifa rate of interest greater than permitted by law is paid, the person paying the same or his legal representative may recover twice the amount of the interest thus paid, The person so adjudged to have received a greater rate of interest shall also be liable for the costs of the suit, including a reasonable 2 attorney's fee to be determined by the court. " RSMo 408.030 (2) RSMo 408.015 RSMo 408.050 Sec. 408.035 RSMo 408:030 (1) RSMo 408.030 Sec. 408.020 to 408.562 Sidid the Trial Court erred in failing to provide relief to the Petitioner under TILA (Truth In Lending Act)? 6 , Did the Circuit Court errered by failing to act in accordance with its duty because Court . failed to submit fact of perjury committed by Respondent to Prosecuting Attorney and failed to recognize Respondent based on the fact of his evasive statements that are false and material to the proceedings in wich the statement is made under oathm, statement . was untrue, new it was untrue with intend to defraud, which is criminal offence? wa Did the Circuit Court abused its discretion and erred in granting to Respondent monetary judgment in the amount of $53,000 even Respondent had withdrew his monetary demand in Count I of his Amended Petition and Count II of his Amended Petion was dismissed, and the only the request for foreclosure of Petitioner’s Land has been filed by Respondent . and all money from the sale of the land be paid to Respondent and to cover attorney fees, and reminder of money from sale will go to Petitioner? . & « Did the circuit court erred in denying Petitioner’s request for punitive damages be awarded to because Respondent defrauded Petitioner by selling the land with fraudlent APR and with excessive amount of fees applied that are not permitted by law? RSMo 407.025 RSMo 407.020 Sec. 408.100 to 408.561 RSMo 408.554 RSMo 407.453 . RSMo 408.555 RSMo 408.562 RSMo 408.052