No. 20-5284
Tags: administrative-law constitutional-authority controlled-substance controlled-substance-offense criminal-law drug-conspiracy sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the U.S. Sentencing Commission's use of the Sentencing Guideline commentary in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 to capture drug conspiracy offenses within the meaning of 'controlled substance offense' exceed the scope of its constitutionally permissible authority, rending that commentary invalid and unenforceable?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s use of the Sentencing Guideline commentary in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 to capture drug conspiracy offenses within the meaning of “controlled substance offense” exceed the scope of its constitutionally permissible authority, rending that commentary invalid and unenforceable? ii
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-07-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 8, 2020)
Attorneys
Tony Lam
Samantha Jean Kuhn — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Samantha Jean Kuhn — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent