Where contract law identifies that an agreement can be signed under bad faith and made voidable by either extrinsic fraud or an intentional omission of pertinent/injurious information about the agreement, does any court have the granting authority to hear such a case if the expiration date to file time has passed?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A. Where CONTRACT LaW IDENTIFIES THAT AN AGREEMENT CAN BE SiéncD UpDdEr “BAO FAITH ABO Made VOIDARLE BY ETHER Extamsic Frau onan WwAOventenT Omissiod OF PERTINENT / INQUILIOUS INFORMATION AQoUT THE AGREEMENT, -Does ANY Count HAVE THE GRANTING AUTHORITY To Head SUCH A CASE (E THE RE xpination DATE To Five Time Has Passo? On, Noes IT FALLON PETITIONER ? o) ‘Dees UABILITY AND ANY INJURY RESULTING FLOM AN AGREEMENT SiépZ0 UNDEIL DAD FAITH, AMD (Ts Provisions, FALL ON A LAWYER THar IWaoverTENTY OMITTED INJURIOUS WWFORMATION WITHIN THE AGRECMENT From A CUEST ? Cronetuea (UTEDTIONAL oO” Acewwewtar Yon, DOES {T FALL ON THE Peritionen ? C. ‘Does UABILITY And ANY psu RESULTING From AN AGREEMENT Sioned UNdzn Bao FAITH, AND iTS PROVISIONS, FALL ON A PROSECUTON THAT INTENTIONALLY? VICLATED CLEARLY ESTABUSHED LAW FOR ConTRACtuAL DEAUNES 7 OR Dogs IT FALL ON THE Perrriouen ¢