Whether a court must employ the presumption against extraterritorial application and the rule of lenity in interpreting a sentencing guideline enhancement provision to determine whether it applies to extraterritorial or merely domestic criminal conduct

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW In the interpretation of a sentencing guideline enhancement provision to determine whether it applies to extraterritorial or merely domestic criminal conduct, must a court employ the presumption against extraterritorial application and the rule of lenity? i INTERESTED PARTIES There parties interested in the proceeding other than those named in the caption of the case are: Miguel Salas Vallecilla (co-defendant) ii