Whether the U.S.D.C. erred in its finding that, in order to obtain relief under Arizona v. Youngblood, Petitioner needs to prove either that evidence was tampered with or lost

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , 1. Whether the United States District Court (“U.S.D.C.”) erred in its finding that, in order to obtain relief under Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51 (1988), Petitioner, in addition to establishing bad faith, needs to prove either that evidence was tampered with or lost. 2. Whether the U.S.D.C. erred in its finding that evidence posted on the internet satisfies the disclosure requirement of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. 3. Whether the state court erred in its finding that a Brady violation requires proof of tampering; and Whether the U.S.D.C. erred in its finding that Order 8.1 does not clearly apply to recordings. 4, Whether the state court erred in its finding that Petitioner did not establish ; ‘evidence of bad faith on the part of detectives for their failure to preserve evidence; and whether the state court erred in its finding that Petitioner failed to link bad faith to evidence presented in the case. F