No. 20-5320

Johnathan Lamar Burks v. Michigan

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2020-08-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: alleyne apprendi due-process mcmillan sixth-amendment watts
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

WHETHER THE GENERAL SIXTH AMENDMENT RULE ANNOUNCED BY THE COURT IN APPRENDI, AS EXTENDED BY ALLEYNE, OVERRULES THE COURT'S HOLDINGS IN BOTH MCMILLAN AND WATTS

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : WHETHER THE GENERAL SIXTH AMENDMENT RULE ANNOUNCED BY THE : ; COURT IN APPRENDI, AS EXTENDED BY ALLEYNE, OVERRULES THE COURT'S HOLDINGS IN BOTH MCMILLAN AND WATTS, WHICH STANDS FoR THE PROPOSITION THAT DUE PROCESS PERMITS A SENTENCING COURT TO CONSIDER CONDUCT OF WHICH A DEFENDANT HAD BEEN AQQUITEED AT TRIAL, USING A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE STANDARD, AND IF : SO, WHETHER DUE PROCESS PRECLUDES A SENTENCING COURT FROM. : CONSIDERING ACQUITTED CONDUCT IN ARTICULATING A SUBSTANTIAL AND COMPELLING REASON IN SUPPORT OF AN UPWARD DEPARTURE FROM AN ESTABLISHED ADVISORY GUIDELINES MINIMUM SENTENCE RANGE? ; -[~

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-09-03
Waiver of right of respondent Michigan to respond filed.
2020-07-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 10, 2020)

Attorneys

Johnathan Lamar Burks
Johnathan Lamar Burks — Petitioner
Johnathan Lamar Burks — Petitioner
Michigan
Amy Marie SomersWayne County Prosecutor' s Office, Respondent
Amy Marie SomersWayne County Prosecutor' s Office, Respondent