Should the Government correct error committed when applying 'The Fair Sentencing Act'

Questions for Review 1.) Should the Government correct error committed when applying ‘The Fair Sentencing Act’ (Nov. 2014)? And if an applicant’s reduction for Substantial Assistance was removed in error by the Government (who did not follow Statute &1B1.10.10 instructions), should the applicant be able to apply the removed substantial assistance to a potential future conviction (Sibron v. New York (1968)? 2.) Ifthe assistance of counsel and/or arresting officer are found to have criminal convictions post the appellant’s plea of guilty, should there be merit to overturn a previous decision? 3.) How can United States v. Gail (2007) be used as justification for error in applying ‘The Fair Sentencing Act’ (Nov. 2014). When United States v. Gall is an at sentencing decision and ‘The Fair Sentencing Act’ has instructions to follow under Statute & 1B1.10? i&