Whether the Shane Cooknell conviction violates the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel when the court denied his request for a continuance to obtain counsel

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED Wore Tha Shane Qookconviien Gourds BwUSmuds Qh LdKeaws “Leake dkow Assivtsaace JF Couansed Udren Wash Quess Xow on\ gorenria “BSUS Low re Yo Cequesy BA Rueance,’ Yet dered “tra. Vaiting, 0 Tie Voc Seuecance Dg dn Ye, Qcemise Yorar XeA\ “Comnsedd Sus W'S Nek Awad tk Any Real “hess +o as Yee Sewer ance. Should Cod reour, lature 2 Subchondia SNosiag ot Yoo band of Qadoneed Condtntu Mona\ Trans Av Contos WS ACGSLE, Plediwe Assihaace af Coucded Aw RVASi af ane orocass af aus WAG BemonswrarQr. h Where, 2 Vode Cours Tals dt salve all claims hich Lon dikvds & Aon-Haal AdA-aperalawe order. Moulk CBA Issn whore. 2 Webaca SLadktick conde Wahhs Bra SEA Yoox tok : Radice B Bae Couc kn Awe ceanons Wwelace ‘Ws bacon can © Net Bama Be hae. aan Scab oe Me MANS. oF Rucawack de Doo vacedaved Quran RCUWeNWA A Wedvias dn Vv Veckins VOD GOs WLI (ro. Gan a Pe aoe Yo ent\ad Wareas cde Waced on 2 Yedacting, clan OF Ackual Tnnoconce, Wood Da CeSaWad, Me Wade Gicca Couns BsCunad. Re Qosden, Wok & Keardhondsnn, ayer FF ACA ranoLeace. Vo Aw Non CASAL Comb US Table “ve O Qeracdd Wawa Coc gus HCOCRABANg, one’s ve Tashoc, WS TA WL (Aun Gi. HOW) and Tardis WRN, SAW FR. Agpx. SAd CYR Gic. hoi)