Thyochus A. Huggins v. California
Immigration
Did the trial court violate Petitioner's rights under the Sixth Amendment as set forth in Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975) when it told Petitioner that he would not be allowed to represent himself again if he decided to proceed with counsel and forced the appointment of counsel against Petitioner's will?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : . 1s Did the trial court violabe. Pelitionare eights under the, Sudlh_ Amendmunt asl Fast ¥ California 422 US. 9060975) when, % Wu 0. Spg\e iod_cf ewif — vepcasantation by PeiHonue ded trio to thal the taunt hin thet he would not be allowed +o. represent himsel® agoin if he deudad to proted with ‘Comeat. and tard chorea the... ezappowrtment of counsal.an Petibionars foe fertuce_ OF hie. Facetto tights 8