Question not identified

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. When the Washington State Constitution, Article I, section 26, says, "No grand jury shall be drawn or summoned in any county, except the superior , judge thereof shall so order." and when Washington State RCW 10.27.030 says, "No grand jury shall be summoned to attend at the superior court of any county except upon an order signed by a majority of the judges : thereof." In particular: (a). Are these laws conflicting? (b). Who has ultimate control? The "superior judge" or "the majority of the judges"? (c). Does this create an unequal class of people who get grand jury's? 2. When Washington State RCW 10.27.030 says, "A grand jury shall be summoned by the court, where public interest so demands, whenever in its opinion there is sufficient evidence of criminal activity or corruption within the county or whenever so requested by a public [prosecuting] attorney, corporation counsel, or by a city attorney upon showing of good cause." In particular: (a). Does this RCW violate Washington State Constitution, Article I, section 12, by creating an unequal class of people who get grand jury's? (b). Is it an unequality between citizens, when a corporation is classified as a citizen, represented by "corporate counsel", and is able to request a grand jury where other citizens are not able to? Page ii QUESTIONS PRESENTED continued (c). Does this RCW, overall, discriminate in its vagueness as to which class of people is worthy of a grand jury and which class is not? 3. Are the laws and Constitution of Washington State vague, conflicting, and discriminate regarding the governing of indictment by a grand jury and an information? in particular: (a). Washington State Constitution: 1. Article I, section 2 2. Article I, section 12 3. Article I, section 25 4. Article I, section 26 (b). Washington State RCW 10.27 to 10.27.190 (c). Washington State Court Rules (CrR) 2.1 4. If the constitution and laws of Washington State are found to be in conflict, vague, or discriminatory, does Washington fall back on Article I, section 2? (a). And does Washington have to apply Title III, Rule 7, the same at the State level as at the Federal level? 5. When Washington State confers a right to a person, does the judge and or a prosecutor determine the application of the conferred right? 6. Was the Petitioners right to a grand jury and the right to waive a grand jury abridged by Washington State? 7. Did Washington abridge Petitioners rights of citizenship? : Page iii .