No. 20-5345
Clarence Taylor v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law confrontation confrontation-right due-process government-burden hearsay revocation-proceeding testimonial-evidence witness-hearsay witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether due process requires the government to make an affirmative showing that a witness is afraid to testify before relying on testimonial hearsay at a revocation proceeding
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. Whether due process requires the government to make an affirmative showing that a witness is afraid to testify before relying on testimonial hearsay at a revocation proceeding. i
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-08-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Clarence Taylor
James S. Thomson — James Thomson, Attorney and Counselor at Law, Petitioner
James S. Thomson — James Thomson, Attorney and Counselor at Law, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent