No. 20-5355
Eddie David Cox v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: appeal circuit-split constitutional-law criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process resentencing sentencing
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars resentencing on counts for sentences a defendant has already served?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars resentencing on counts for sentences a defendant has already served?
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-21
Rescheduled.
2020-12-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-20
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2020-10-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 20, 2020.
2020-10-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 21, 2020 to November 20, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-09-21
Response Requested. (Due October 21, 2020)
2020-08-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-08-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Eddie Cox
Brandon Creighton Sample — Brandon Sample PLLC, Petitioner
Brandon Creighton Sample — Brandon Sample PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent